Thursday, July 26, 2018

CASE HARVARD: Cost of Capital at Ameritrade Corp (32)


1. What factors should Ameritrade management consider when evaluating the proposed advertising program and technology upgrades? Why?
2. How can the Capital Asset Pricing Model be used to estimate the cost of capital for a real (not financial) investment decision?
3. What is the estimate of the risk-free rate and market risk premium that should be employed in calculating the cost of capital for Ameritrade?
4. In principle, what are the steps for computing the asset beta in the CAPM for purposes of calculating the cost of capital for a project?
5. Ameritrade does not have a beta estimate as the firm has been publicly traded for only a short time period. Exhibit 4 provides various choices of comparable firms. What comparable firms do you recommend as the appropriate benchmarks for evaluating the risk of Ameritrade’s planned advertising and technology investments?

Solution word in www.casesmba.com

CASO: Diamond Chemicals PLC (A): El Proyecto Merseyside (34)


1. What changes, if any, should Lucy Morris ask Frank Greystock make in his discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis? Why? What should Morris be prepared to say to the Transport Division, the director of sales, her assistant plant manager, and the analyst from the Treasury Staff?

2. How attractive is the Merseyside project? By what criteria?

3. Should Morris continue to promote the project for funding?

Solution word in www.casesmba.com

CASE HARVARD: Kota Fibres LTD. (36)


  1. How did Mehta construct his financial forecast? Using the financial forecast, prepare to show the “cash cycle” of the firm (i.e., the flow of funds through the working-capital accounts of the firm)Using the financial projections and the assumptions provided in Annexes 10 and 11
  2. Examine the exhibits in the case. On the basis of Mehta’s forecast, how much debt will Kota need to arrange for the coming year? Will Kota be able to repay the line of credit this year?
  3. Why do Kota’s financial requirements vary across the year? What are the key determinants of Kota’s borrowing needs? Please exercise the spreadsheet model to identify the critical forecast assumptions.
  4. Why does the bank require 1 30-day “clean-up” of the loan? Should the bank continue to waive compliance with this covenant? 
  5. Consider the four memos that Pundir received. Use your intuition to assess the desirability of the proposals. How each of them probably affect Kota's borrowing needs?
  6. Study the production level annex of Kota Fibers, related to the proposal at the production level and be prepared to explain why the average level of the loan increase grows and yet the maximum amount of the loans is reduced. 
  7. Are there other strategies that should be considered? How viable are these other strategies in the context of the competitive landscape? 

Solution word and excel in www.casesmba.com

CASE HARVARD: KOTA FIBERS LTD. V2 (37)


(Questions for Case Preparation)
The following questions will help you in the preparation and analysis of this case. Use these questions as a guide in your study of the case. However, do not limit yourselves to these questions only, but rather allow yourselves to expand your thinking and analysis of this case.
1. How did Mehta construct his financial forecast? Using the financial forecast, prepare to show the “cash cycle” of the firm (i.e., the flow of funds through the working-capital accounts of the firm).
2. Examine the exhibits in the case. On the basis of Mehta’s forecast, how much debt will Kota need to arrange for the coming year? Will Kota be able to repay the line of credit this year?
3. Why do Kota’s financial requirements vary across the year? What are the key determinants of Kota’s borrowing needs? Please exercise the spreadsheet model to identify the critical forecast assumptions.
4. Consider the four memos that Pundir received. Use your intuition to assess the desirability of two of the proposals:
 ➢ Pondicherry’s request for credit: What will be the effect of this proposal on accounts receivable and debt balances across the year?
 ➢ The level-production proposal: If Kota undertakes level production now, at the low point of the annual business cycle, what is the likelihood of inventory stock-outs at the peak of the business cycle? If Kota undertakes level production just after the peak, what will happen to inventory and debt balances at the cyclical low? Are these proposals liable to relieve, or worsen, Kota’s ability to “clean up” its bank loan by the end of 2001? What action should Pundir take on these two proposals?
5. Why does the bank require 1 30-day “clean-up” of the loan? Should the bank continue to waive compliance with this covenant?
6. Please identify the three most important actions or policies that Pundir should take. What should Pundir say to the bank and to the customers?

Solution word in www.casesmba.com

CASE HARVARD: PETROZUATA (35)


(PETROZUATA) CASE ANALYSIS:
Q1. HOW SHOULD PDVSA FINANCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ORINOCO BASIN? WHAT ARE THE COSTS AND BENEFITS OF USING PROJECT FINANCE INSTEAD OF TRADITIONAL DEBT FINANCE?
Q2. WHAT ARE PETROZUATA’A THREE OR FOUR MOST IMPORTANT RISKS? HOW DOES THE DEAL STRUCTURE ADDRESS THESE RISKS? WHO WOULD BEAR THESE RISKS IF THE PROJECT WERE FINANCED INTERNALLY BY PDVSA INSTEAD?
Q3. AS CURRENTLY ENVISIONED, DEBT WILL COMPROMISE OF 60% OF THE FUNDS NEEDED FOR THE PROJECT. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND A HIGHER OR A LOWER LEVERAGE RATIO? WHAT HAPPENS TO THE MINIMUM DSCR AND IRR ON EQUITY AS THE PROJECT LEVERAGE INCREASES TO 70% OF THE PROJECT FUNDS? DECREASES BY 50%?
Q4. AS ONE OF THE SPONSORS, WHAT ARE YOUR EXPECTED RETURNS? ASSUME THE ASSET BETA FOR AN INTEGRATED DRILLING, PIPELINE AND REFINING FIRM IS 0.60.
Q5. WOULD YOU INVEST IN PROJECT BONDS? WOULD YOU INVEST IN EQUITY CAPITAL AS CONCO?
Q6. HOW SHOULD PDVSA FINANCE ITS OTHER OILFIELD PROJECTS?

SOLUTION WORD IN WWW.CASESMBA.COM

CASO HARVARD: America Online, Inc (AOL) (33)

  1. Prior to 1995, why was AOL so successful in the commercial online industry relative to its competitors CompuServe and Prodigy?
  2. As of 1995, what are the key changes taking place in the commercial online industry? How are they likely to affect AOL’s future prospects?
  3. Was AOL’s policy to capitalize subscriber acquisition costs justified prior to 1995?
  4. Given the changes discussed in question 2, do you think AOL should change its accounting policy as of 1995? Is the company’s response consistent with your view?
  5. What would be the effect on AOL's 1994 and 1995 ending balance sheets if the company had followed the policy of expensing subscriber acquisition outlays instead of capitalizing them? What would be the effect of expensing subscriber acquisition costs on AOL's 1995 income statement?

Solution word in www.casesmba.com

CASO: HANSSON PRIVATE LABEL, INC.: EVALUATING AN INVESTMENT IN EXPANSION (38)


Student Assignment:
  1. How would you describe HPL and its position within the private label personal care industry? Consider HPL’s size, growth, profitability and capital structure relative to its “peer” group. 
  2. Using the assumptions made by the Executive VP of Manufacturing, Robert Gates, estimate the projects potential free-cash-flows (FCFs). Are Gates’ projections realistic?  If not, what changes might you suggest be incorporated? 
  3. Using CFO Sheila Dowling’s projected weighted-average-cost of capital (WACC) schedule, what discount rate would you choose? What flaws, if any, might be inherent in using the WACC as the discount rate? 
  4. Estimate the project’s net present value. Would you recommend that Tucker Hansson proceed with the investment?  If yes, why?  If no, why not?

Solution word in www.casesmba.com

CASE HARVARD: Seagate Technology Buyout (39)


  1. Why is Seagate undertaking this transaction? Is it necessary to divest the Veritas shares in a separate transaction? Who are the winners and losers resulting from the transaction?
  2. What are the benefits of leveraged buyouts? Is the rigid disk drive industry conducive to a leveraged buyout?
  3. Luczo and the buyout team plan to finance their acquisition of Seagate’s operating assets using a combination of debt and equity. How much debt would you recommend that they use? Why? 
  4. Based on the scenarios presented in Exhibit 8, and on your assessment of the optimal amount of debt to be used in Seagate’s capital structure, how much are Seagate’ operating assets worth? For both of the assumptions listed, estimate the value of Seagate’s operating assets. Assume that of the $800 million in cash that buyout team will acquire as part of the transaction, $500 million is required for net working capital and $300 million is excess cash.
a. Assume that the buyout team plans to maintain its debt at a constant percentage of the firm’s market value.
b. Assume that the buyout team plans to pay down its debt as cash flows permit until a terminal debt level of $700 million reached

Solution word in www.casesmba.com

CASE HARVARD: the acquisition of consolidated rail corporation (A) (41)


Conrail Case Study
1.  Why does CSX want to buy Conrail? Why can CSX justify paying a premium to acquire Conrail?
2. Why would the Surface Transportation Board (STB) likely approve the merger (i.e., why might the STB not be too concerned about the impact the merger will have on competition in the northeast)?
3. How much should CSX be willing to pay for Conrail? Value Conrail using the multiples of competitors as well comparable transactions methods. For calculations, show your work (don’t just write the final number).
4. Analyze the structure of CSX’s offer for Conrail.
(a) Why did CSX make a two-tiered offer?
(b) Discuss the various anti-takeover measures included in the CSX-Conrail merger agreement (i.e., no-talk clause, poison pill, break-up fee, lock-up options). What implications do these provisions have for the cost of acquiring Conrail for other bidders (other than CSX)?
5. As a shareholder of Conrail, would you tender your shares to CSX at $92.50 in the first-stage offer? Why?

Solution word in www.casesmba.com

CASE HARVARD: the acquisition of consolidated rail corporation (40)


Case A
Question 1: Why is CSX interested in Conrail? How much should CSX pay for Conrail? 
Question 2a: Analyse the structure of the CSX-Conrail deal. Why did CSX make a two tiered offer? What effect does this structure have on the transaction?
Question 2b: What are the economics rationales and takeover implications of the various provisions in the merger agreement (no talk clause, lockup options, breakup fee, and poison pill?)
Question 3: As a Conrail Shareholder would you tender your shares to CSX at a price of 92.50 in the first offer?


Case B
Question 1: Why did Norfolk Southern make a hostile bid for Conrail?
Question 2: How much is Conrail worth? In a bidding war who would be willing to pay more Norfolk Southern or CSX? 
Question 3: Why does CSX refer to Norfolk’s bid as a non-bid? What should Norfolk Southern do as of Mid-January 1997?
Question 4: As a shareholder would you vote to opt-out of the Pennsylvania antitakeover statute? What do the capital markets expect to happen?
Question 5: What are the costs and benefits of regulating the market for corporate control for statutes such as Pennsylvania’s anti-takeover law?

Other question
Question 1: Why is CSX interested in acquiring Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail)? Describe the arguments for the offer being motivated by synergies, as well as arguments for the motivation to pre-empt a bid by Norfolk.

Solution word in www.casesmba.com

CASE HARVARD: Cooper Industries. Inc (42)


Mergers and Acquisitions
Cooper Industries. Inc
  1. If you were Mr. Cizik of Cooper Industries, Inc., would you try to gain control of Nicholson File Company in May 1972?
  2. What is the maximum price that Cooper can afford to pay for Nicholson and still keep the acquisition attractive from the standpoint of Cooper?
  3. What are the concerns and what is the bargaining position of each group of Nicholson stockholders? What must Cooper offer each group in order to acquire its shares?
  4. On the assumption that the Cooper management wants to acquire at least 80 percent of the outstanding Nicholson stock and to make the same offer to all stockholders, what offer must Cooper management make in terms of dollar value and the form of payment (cash, stock, debt).
  5. What should Mr. Cizik recommend that the Cooper management do?

Solution word in www.casesmba.com

CASE HARVARD: Analysis of Cooper Industries, Inc. (43)


Analysis of Cooper Industries, Inc.
  1. If you were Mr. Cizik of Cooper Industries, would you try to gain control of Nicholson File Company in May 1972?
  2. What is the Maximum price that Cooper can afford to pay for Nicholson and still keep the acquisition attractive from the standpoint of Cooper?
  3. What are the concerns and what is the bargaining position of each group of Nicholson stockholders? What must Cooper offer each group in order to acquire its shares?
  4. On the assumption that the Cooper Management wants to acquire at least 80% of the outstanding Nicholson stock and to make the same offer to all stockholders, what offer must Cooper management make—in terms of dollar value and of the form of payment (cash, stock, debt)?
  5. What should Mr. Cizik recommend that the Cooper management do?

Solution word in www.casesmba.com

Saturday, July 21, 2018

CASE: REESE CAMPBELL CASE SCENARIO (31)

Reese Campbell is an equity analyst at triad investment management (TIM), an asset management firm that offer investment products to private wealth and institutional clients. Campbell is evaluating the appropriateness of several investments to include in their aggressive equity fund, a fund that has a mandate of achieving high returns by investing in risky ventures.
Campbell is currently evaluating the financial value of capital enterprises. Capital enterprises is a manufacturing and trading firm with a current free cash flow to the firm of $350 million. Based on its target capital structure, the firm will constitute of 30 percent debt. CE´s cost of debt is 6.4%, and based on the riskiness of its cash flows, its equity investors require a return of 12.2%.
Campbell has estimate that the company FCFF would grow at a long-term growth rate of 4.5%. The current market value of de company´s debt is $1.3 billion, and the firm has 150 million shares outstanding. The tax rate is 37%.
Campbell is examining the financial statement of emergent technologies (ET), a technology firm incorporated in 2006 with an initial investment in fixed capital of $700,000. Exhibit 1 and 2 display some information from the financial statements of the firm for three years following incorporation (the figures given are in thousands)
Campbell is planning to use the statement of cash flow of a distributing firm to estimate the free cash flow to the firm and free cash flow to equity. However, Campbell knows that the effects of different accounting standards related to the cash flow statement must be kept in mind before proceeding with the calculations. For clarification, Campbell approached Jeremiah Bret, her supervisor at the firm. Bret made the following comments:
Statement 1: "To estimate FCFF starting with FCO, the treatment of interest must be kept in mind. Although the U.S. GAAP treats interest paid or received as operating activities, the IFRS treats them as either operating or financing activities"
Statement 2: "The value of a firm can be estimated by discounting FCFF using the WACC calculated on a pre-tax basis. However, for this, the FCFF should be computed by adding back interest paid with no tax adjustment".
Bret is estimating the FCFF of SkyHigh Manufacturing Ltd. (SHM), a firm that earned a net income of $310,000 over the most recent year. The firm underwent corporate restructuring a few years ago and the net income includes an amount of $50,000 resulting from a reversal of a previous accrual. In addition, the firm has recorded a gain of $30,000 from the sale of its equipment, and has amortized long-term bond discounts in the amount of $55,000. Some of the financial information for the current year is provided in Exhibit 3. The company has a tax rate of 30%.
While talking to Campbell about her analysis, Bret made the following comment:
“The FCFF could also be calculated using the firm´s EBIT and EBITDA amounts. However, there is one slight difference in using these two amounts as a starting point for calculating FCFF.”
1. Capital Enterprises value per share is closest to:
  1. $56.57
  2. $35.78
  3. $37.78
 2. The FCFF (in thousands) of Emergent Technologies  for the year 2008 is closest to:
  1. $205.052
  2. $144.572
  3. $110.092
 3. The FCFF (in thousands) of Emergent Technologies  for the year 2009 is closest to:
  1. $239.30
  2. $222.072
  3. $210.753
 4. Bret is most accurate whit respect to:
  1. Statement 1 only
  2. Statement 2 only
  3. Both statement 1 and 2
 5. The FCFF for SkyHigh Manufacturing Ltd for the current year is closest to:
  1. $16,000
  2. $26,000
  3. $  6,000
 6. The difference in estimating FCFF using EBIT versus using EBITDA as a starting point is most likely related to the handling of:
  1. Interest
  2. Depreciation
  3. Taxes

Solution in excel  www.casesmba.com

CASE: Valuing Cross-Border LBO: Bidding on the Yell Group (30)

  1. Is Yell a good leveraged buyout candidate?
  2. How similar are the U.K. and U.S. businesses? Do the management projections in Exhibit 6 and Exhibit 7 make sense to you? In other words, if you were part of the Apax/Hicks Muse team, would you trust them?
  3. How does Yell’s projected debt affect its valuation?
  4. How does the cross-border nature of the Yell deal affect the valuation of the firm?
  5. How much is Yell worth? How much would you bid?
  6. If you were Apax/Hicks Muse would you do the deal?

Solution in word www.casesmba.com